| Author |
Message |
John Little
Joined: 07 May 2006
Posts: 56
Location: Centennial, Colorado
|
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 8:06 pm Post subject: D200 |
|
|
Well, I could not help myself.
I looked at the price of the D80 and the D200, without realizing that the store had not updated it's prices in the display for the D200.
With the price reduction, it was a no-brainer. So when my D50 gets back, it will become my back-up camera, and I have promoted the D200 for day to day use.
After I get some time with it under my belt, I will report back. I have posted about 20 pictures that I have taken during the week on my lunch break at KAPA.
These are settings that I took from an online recommendation, but I am going to adjust them back to some defaults because the pictures with the online settings are way to washed out for my taste, and would need some real work in Photoshop (thats my next purchase).
I just don't shoot NEF or RAW, because JPG really turns out just fine for my purposes.
Is there anyone else shooting RAW ? |
|
 |
|
| Author |
Message |
John Little
Joined: 07 May 2006
Posts: 56
Location: Centennial, Colorado
|
Posted: Thu Jun 07, 2007 12:43 pm Post subject: Sensor Cleaning |
|
|
That may be the difference, is the use of the brush type cleaners as opposed to the use of the "kits" that rely on the liquids and thin layers of cleaning clothes that are sold.
I got the D50 back and the folks I sent it to did a great job, and at only 65.00 to have it done, I am not going to complain.
I have now sent in the D200 for cleaning (only 5 weeks old), and what I noticed was that right out of the box, the sensor had a great deal more dust than the D50 had out of the box. The 70-300 VR had never been off the D200 body since it was purchased, I keow that field and randon dust had not gotten into the camera due to use.
The store I purchased the D200 from (as well as the D50) told me that there had been a greater number of D200's coming back in for cleaning in a shorter period of time in comparison to other cameras. There was no reasonable explanation from them, but I did not really expect they would have one
I did try and clean the sensor with the kit I had, but I did not get much more sataisfaction than I found while trying to clean the D50.
But being able to swap the bodies during the cleaning cycles really takes the urgency out of the situation.
I am not opposed to trying the alternative cleaning products and processes, but the article you cited made one thing clear, and that may be the issue to watch for......the brushes have to be absolutely clean and free of any contamination, and short of the "clean room" that might be a tough one to guarantee.
I appreciate your ideas though, and maybe at some point the digital camera people will be able to devise a way to create either an anti-static barrier in the camera body itself, or even make it possible to remove the sensor and cover so that you can easily clean it without being concerned about the other internals of the camera. |
|
 |
|
| Author |
Message |
KenJr

Joined: 06 Oct 2007
Posts: 8
Location: Kissimmee, FL
|
|
 |
|
|